Page 1 of 2

Radio Caca impression

Posted: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22
by FlatcherMI
The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 24 Dec 2021, 09:43
by Andrew67
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Why are you so angry? It has some good options with trading photo NFTs and in game NFTs

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39
by LemonInvest
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Yes i agree on that one but i have found some relatively good items so why not

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 07 Jan 2022, 16:40
by LemonInvest
Andrew67 wrote: 24 Dec 2021, 09:43
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Why are you so angry? It has some good options with trading photo NFTs and in game NFTs
You can trade game NFT on a lot of different other platfroms. It doesnt mean that much

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 15 Jan 2022, 12:07
by Nile
Andrew67 wrote: 24 Dec 2021, 09:43
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Why are you so angry? It has some good options with trading photo NFTs and in game NFTs
Yes it is one of the best options for in game NFTs so far. Take my claim

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 15 Jan 2022, 12:08
by Nile
LemonInvest wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Yes i agree on that one but i have found some relatively good items so why not
The items here are mid quality but im sure we can bring the stats up

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 26 Jan 2022, 14:38
by tyufhf
LemonInvest wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Yes i agree on that one but i have found some relatively good items so why not
I havent found anything satisfiying here... What have you found would you share?

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 26 Jan 2022, 14:39
by tyufhf
Nile wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 12:08
LemonInvest wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Yes i agree on that one but i have found some relatively good items so why not
The items here are mid quality but im sure we can bring the stats up
i would say it not mid quality its no quality. Why bother it even

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 08 Feb 2022, 18:37
by Lamar
Nile wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 12:07
Andrew67 wrote: 24 Dec 2021, 09:43
FlatcherMI wrote: 22 Dec 2021, 21:22 The website is made pretty badly and the art that they are showng is also low quility as well. Do not recommend
Why are you so angry? It has some good options with trading photo NFTs and in game NFTs
Yes it is one of the best options for in game NFTs so far. Take my claim
Why are you claiming that? Can you hold your statement and support it?

Re: Radio Caca impression

Posted: 08 Feb 2022, 18:37
by Lamar
tyufhf wrote: 26 Jan 2022, 14:39
Nile wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 12:08
LemonInvest wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39

Yes i agree on that one but i have found some relatively good items so why not
The items here are mid quality but im sure we can bring the stats up
i would say it not mid quality its no quality. Why bother it even
There are some but... yeah it quite crap